Renowned illusionist and psychic entertainer Uri Geller has publicly criticized a recent decision by Guinness World Records concerning Israel, calling it “more twisted than my spoons.” Known globally for his feats of spoon-bending and mind tricks, Geller did not hold back in expressing his disappointment with the world-record organization, describing the decision as “unfair and perplexing.”
The controversy centers around Guinness World Records’ recognition — or lack thereof — of an achievement linked to Israel, which Geller claims deserves global acknowledgment. Speaking to the media, he said, “I’ve bent thousands of spoons over my career, but even my spoons are straighter than this decision. It defies logic and fairness.”
Fans and social media users quickly picked up on Geller’s comments, sparking debates online about the fairness, transparency, and political sensitivities that sometimes influence Guinness World Records’ adjudications. Some supporters defended Geller’s stance, arguing that record-keeping should remain strictly factual and impartial, free from geopolitical considerations.
Guinness World Records has yet to issue a detailed response to Geller’s remarks, but the organization maintains that all records are verified according to strict guidelines, requiring extensive evidence, verification, and compliance with international standards. Experts note that while the organization strives for impartiality, disputes occasionally arise when cultural, political, or technical complexities are involved.
This is not the first time Uri Geller has voiced his opinions on Guinness World Records; throughout his career, he has often challenged institutions and skeptics, blending showmanship with controversy. In this latest statement, he continues that tradition, using his characteristic wit and flair to draw attention to what he perceives as an oversight.
Whether Guinness World Records will reconsider or clarify the decision remains uncertain, but Geller’s comments have certainly reignited discussion around how records are verified, the role of bias in adjudication, and the thin line between spectacle and bureaucracy in the world of record-breaking feats.
